Monday, 29 April 2013

week 4



As a student studing in finance, I cannot imagine the difficulty for a company to raise capital for some projects. The financing process is complicated which involves many factors. 

When a company grows rapidly, for example when contemplating investment in capital equipment or an acquisition, its current financial resources may be inadequate. Few growing companies are able to finance their expansion plans from cash flow alone. They will need to consider raising finance from other external sources to achieve their objectives (Arnold G, 2008).

Before raising capital, an important term needs to be addressed is the rate of return (Arnold G, 2008). If the rate of return is too close to the cost of capital, it risks profitability of the project if any unforeseen circumstances arise. As the example of Sky, after they released their broadband package in 2006, they predicted a post tax return of 15% by 2011. It would be expected that to ensure profitability, the return however shrinks to 10.5 per cent post tax, compared with Sky's group weighted average cost of capital (WACC), estimated at about 9 per cent. The new investment that does little more than meet its cost of capital in five years is hardly compelling - particularly given that Sky's assumptions on further price deflation in broadband provision may prove conservative.

Another important issue is to find the best method to fund these returns. The two main methods are debt and equity. In debt, bankers request interest payments and capital repayments, while in equity, the borrowed money is usually secured on business assets or the personal assets of shareholders and/or directors. It should be noted that bank also has the power to place a business into administration or bankruptcy if it defaults on debt interest or repayments or its prospects decline. In contrast, equity investors take the risk of failure like other shareholders, whilst they will benefit through participation in increasing levels of profits and on the eventual sale of their stake (McNulty, J., Yeh, T.D., Schulze, W. & Lubatkin, M, 2006). 

Today, the most popular and secure method is selling its shares on a stock exchange. Usually there is no obligation to pay dividends. Additional, the capital does not have to be repaid. However, this method suffers limitations that the return required to satisfy shareholders, moreover, it may loss of control and dividends cannot be uses to reduce taxable profit. If the company can give up an amount of ownership in the business, raising finance through equity is an optimal choice. It is should be note that raising equity finance need a long time, and the cost of listing shares on the stock market, you have to plan a hell of a long way in advance (Brealey, Richard, Myers, Stewart & Allen Franklin, 2006).

The main source of business finance is venture capital (Lumby S, 2003). It is a general term to describe a range of ordinary and preference shares where the investing institution acquires a share in the business. Venture capital is intended for higher risks such as startup situations and development capital for more mature investments. Replacement capital brings in an institution in place of one of the original shareholders of a business who wishes to realize their personal equity before the other shareholders. There are over 100 different venture capital funds in the UK and some have geographical or industry preferences. There are also certain large industrial companies which have funds available to invest in growing businesses and this 'corporate venturing' is an additional source of equity finance.

Raising finance is often a complex process. Business management need sto assess several alternatives and then negotiate terms which are acceptable to the finance provider. During the finance raising process, accountants are often called to review the financial aspects of the plan. Their report may be formal or informal, an overview or an extensive review of the company's management information system, forecasting methods and their accuracy, review of latest management accounts including working capital, pension funding and employee contracts etc. This due diligence process is used to highlight any fundamental problems that may exist.



Reference

Arnold, G. (2008). Corporate financial management (4th ed.). Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall

Brealey, Richard, Myers, Stewart and Allen Franklin (2006). Principles of Corporate Finance, 8TH Edition

Lumby, S. and Jones, C. (2003) Corporate Finance- theory and practice, 7th ed. Thompson.

McNulty, J., Yeh, T.D., Schulze, W. & Lubatkin, M. (2002) What's Your Real Cost of Capital? Harvard Business Review.


Sunday, 28 April 2013

Week 11 Dividend Policy

The primary objective of financial management is the maximization of shareholder's wealth. To achieve this objective, management, the custodians of shareholders' interests, are faced with three important categories of decision making namely, investment, financing and dividend decisions. Investment decisions determine the total value and types of assets a firm employs. Financing decisions determine the capital structure of the firm and forms the source on which investment decisions are made. Dividend decisions in the form of dividend policies, which form the focus of this study, involve the determination of the pay out policy that management follows in determining the size and pattern of cash distributions to shareholders over time (Lease, 2000). According to Botha (Feldstein&Green,2002), the investment, financing and dividend decisions are interdependent and must be resolved simultaneously. A combination of these policy decisions should theoretically maximize shareholders' wealth.

Growth in the valuation model of share price represents the earnings generated by investment decisions in projects that create excess cash flows. Management has to decide how these earnings are to be allocated, either by reinvesting in the assets of the firm or by way of a distribution to shareholders in the form of a dividend. In making its decision, management has to constantly strive to increase the value of the firm. This increased value of the firm results in a concomitant increase in the value of shareholders' wealth

In order to create excess cash flows, management has to invest in project that have positive net present values (NPV'S). This is known as applying the NPV rule. The excess cash flows generated by positive NPV projects result in higher earnings. According to Frankfurter (2002), management can either decide to distribute these earnings as a cash dividend or reinvest them in the firm to generate even higher cash flows in the future. The decision to pay a dividend would depend on whether the firm can invest the excess earnings  in positive NPV projects in the future. In maximizing shareholders' wealth, management should only invest in projects with positive NPV values otherwise excess earnings should be paid out to shareholders in the form of a dividend.

Kaen(2003) states if dividends are paid out to shareholders only after surplus earnings have been invested in positive NPV projects then the firm follows a residual dividend policy. In this situation, the payments of dividends are closely linked to the availability of excess earnings due to the availability of positive NPV projects. Because of this link between dividends and earnings, dividends will mimic earnings from one period to another. If earnings are good and there are only a limited number of positive NPV projects to invest in then the residue of earnings are high and high dividends will be paid to shareholders. The opposite would be true if the situation is reversed. This volatility in dividend payments to shareholders from period to period would negatively influence share price because of the difficulty in predicting future dividends, a key determinant of share price.

A managed dividend policy, on the other hand, attempts to smooth dividend payments relative to earnings and investments. By following this policy, management attempts to fix dividend payments to certain levels of earnings and will only increase dividend payments once an increased level of earnings can be sustained. According to Lease et al (2000), under a managed dividend policy, managers are managing the dividend level and growth. Dividends grow in even increments and are predictable. Shareholders would have much more confidence in predicting the dividend in the following year than would shareholders under a residual policy.